top of page
pexels-abdullah-çadırcı-7910529.jpg

Exploring Processes of (Re)shaping and Intergenerational Transmission of War Narratives 

The Battle of War Narratives in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Project Description

Welcome to our case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina which aims to explore processes of (re)shaping and intergenerational transmission of narratives about the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The war, lasting from 1992 to 1996, is often described as an exceptionally socio-politically intricate and violent conflict characterised by atrocities and serious violations of international criminal law not seen on European soil since the Second World War. Following Slovenia and Croatia’s lead in declaring independence from the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1991 and motivated by disagreement with Belgrade’s separatist policies and the war in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina decided to proclaim its independence in 1992. Only a month later, the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina started when Bosnian Serb forces, backed by officials in Belgrade, besieged the capital city of Sarajevo and launched ethnic cleansing campaigns in eastern Bosnia aiming to establish ethnic dominance and Serb control over the Bosnian territory. During the war, more than 36 000 civilians were killed, an estimated 20 000 to 50 000 women were (systematically) raped or sexually enslaved, thousands detained and tortured, more than 2 million people were displaced as a result of war, and 8372 (mostly) men and boys were executed in the Srebrenica genocide. It is quite difficult, especially using numbers, to describe and rightfully portray to the reader the far-reaching and long-lasting consequences of the Bosnian conflict. People of Bosnia very often, even in casual conversations, note that there is probably not a single person present in the country during the war that has not been directly affected by the war in one way or another. An information that there are still, 30 years after the war started, more than 7000 victims of war whose remains have not been found might only begin to portray the long-lasting consequences of this conflict.

The war ended following the Dayton Peace Accords signed in December 1995 which marked the onset of the especially complicated and still ongoing transitional challenges of establishing a democratic political and judicial system, (re)building the country and its socio-political institutions as well as ensuring justice and reparations for victims. One of the most important obligations imposed by the Accords was for Bosnia to “cooperate fully” with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY). This obligation was even included in the Bosnian Constitution thus making the Tribunal one of the most important transitional justice processes for the country. Established in May 1993, the ICTY was created by the United Nations Security Council as a response to reports of mass atrocities occurring in Croatia and especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Although primarily tasked with ensuring accountability for war crimes during and in the aftermath of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the ICTY has also created a comprehensive and detailed historical record of wartime events – an authoritative, evidence-based narrative of the Bosnian war.

However, almost thirty years after the end of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the ICTY & narrative about wartime events is frequently denied, ignored or reinterpreted to reinforce the ethnohistorical narratives of war. Three major ethnic groups, Bosniaks, Serbs and Croats, are still in conflict over the legacy of the past war which is often triggered by the ICTY’s historical legacy and the narrative components about the Bosnian war created by the Tribunal. The conflict over differing narratives about the Bosnian war is one of the biggest destabilising factors in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It does not only hinder state-level political and institutional functioning as well as efforts to maintain peace in the country but it also obstructs reconciliation and encourages further inter-ethnic animosity. The conflict over war narratives in Bosnia is not only present among those with first-hand experience of the war.

They are also very much present among the younger generations who did not directly experience the war. The younger generations, through their parents; substantial influence and processes of narrative transmittance, construct their own war narratives which they articulate and promote in their everyday lives. But what role does the most important and influential transitional justice process for the country, the ICTY, play in these processes? To what extent and how is the narrative about the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina developed by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) 1) adopted by individuals who experienced the war, and subsequently, 2) transmitted to their descendants?

Our case study aspires to zoom into these important, under-researched, and immensely
interesting phenomena, processes, and relationships by utilising a mixed-method approach consisting of theoretical framework development, quantitative survey research, and qualitative semi-structured interviews. By investigating narrative development, (re)shaping, transmittance, and factors impacting these processes, we aim to conceptualise and explain the complex interrelations between international criminal justice, historical narratives, memory, and intergenerational transmission of narratives. Follow our project as we attempt to discover, define, and unravel the complexities of war legacies still very much influential in the post-conflict rehabilitation and reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

 Relevant Literature

Ashplant, T., Dawson, G., Roper, M. (Eds.). (2000). The politics of war memory and commemoration. Routledge.

Milanović, M. (2016). The Impact of the ICTY on the Former Yugoslavia: An anticipatory postmortem. The American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 233–259.

​

Stover, E., & Weinstein, H. (Eds.). (2004). My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stahn, C., Agius, C., Brammertz, S. & Rohn, C. (Eds.) (2020). Legacies of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford Academic.

bottom of page